Skip to main content

What can bring Peace? Open Grazing: An Invisible Violence in Nigeria

Audio – What can bring Peace? Open Grazing: An Invisible Violence in Nigeria

Overview

Open grazing practice is characteristically an invisible violence as well as a visible trigger of violence in Nigeria. It causes harm and violates people’s sense of security, belonging, and emotional postures because of the entrenched behaviours and by power wielding ruling elites. Watching several herds of cattle trooping along your farm is never a good sight. It is a distressing view. Immediately, it generates emotional disturbances, reveals the economic hegemony in the political sphere, engenders distrust, provokes frustration and remonstrate economic injustice in the system. It becomes impossible to exist as a citizen because such an invisible violence is irredeemable, and pervasive on one hand, and appears non-consequential on the other. 

Showing herds of cattle grazing in open field

Open grazing practice is also a visible trigger for violence.

The cattle eat or destroy farmers’ crops, the farmers chase the cattle away. The herders invade the farmers’ homes. The farmers and the herders engage in battles. The cattle die, farms are destroyed, homes are destroyed, and people are killed.

Persistent conflicts in Nigeria border around natural resources: land, water, forests, animals, and minerals. These natural resources, one can argue are the reasons for different calls for cessation of one or two ethnic groups from other ethnic groups that make up Nigeria.

This writing will follow this outline:

  1. What can bring Peace?
  2. Open Grazing and Ranching

1. What can bring Peace?

In Nigeria for example, farmers and herders have engaged in violent clashes that has resulted in more than 1300 deaths and about 300,000 have been displaced in their homes. The past administration just ‘stood back and stood by’ while lives were wasted, crops destroyed, and people became refugees in their own states in so-called ‘peace time.’ The effect is brutal. Because there was no security, farmers could not farm. Because farmers did not farm, there is no food in the entire country. Because there is no production of food, the entire country is hungry. Because there were no crops to sell, the treasury is empty.

To prevent this from happening and to proffer solutions, the national assembly in this current administration are about to pass a bill called: National Animal Husbandry and Ranches Commission sponsored by Senator Titus Tartenger Zam. The bill is meant to manage, regulate, and preserve cattle rearing and ranching in Nigeria. The bill also will prohibit open grazing in Nigeria and make it a punishable offence by the law. The bill equally will establish ranches in the states of origin of pastoralists.

In a visibly divided country like Nigeria, though, the bill is sternly criticised by some of the senators from the northern part of the country, it passed its second hearing and is now with the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Judiciary, and Legal Matters for reviews.

This move will help lessen or prevent the constant and violent clashes between the herders and farmers, stem other allied visible triggers of violence, such as heinous crimes (sporadic killings), religious bigotry and ethnic conflicts.

If the bill passes, Nigeria will have a ranching system of rearing livestock in the north, which exists already in southern Nigeria. In southern Nigeria, goats, sheep and cows are kept in pens and shelters. What are the differences between open grazing and ranching?

2. Open Grazing and Ranching

There are some major challenges and benefits associated with open grazing and ranching.

Free Movement and Land Use

In open grazing, cattle are allowed to freely move around a large, unprotected areas of land. This is known as natural pasture, but it is effective in regions with enormous vast swathes of countryside.

Ranching is the direct opposite of open grazing. In this case, cattle are secured within a designated vast swathe of land. The cattle are controlled and managed properly with supplementary feeding and care.

Animal Husbandry

In open grazing, the cattle are at the mercy of predators, diseases, and harsh weather conditions. Also, open grazing can help in spreading of cow diseases because infected cattle are not contained within to be properly monitored.

While ranching provides better protection and care for the cattle, including medical, shelter, warmth, and extra feeding.

Economic Factor

In open grazing, the herder does not need to construct fences, or shelters for the cattle. In essence, it costs nothing to have the cattle in open swathes of lands. But this practice exposes the herders to risks of losing their cattle or even having constant conflicts with other landowners.

Ranching on the other hand can be capital intensive. The herders would construct fences, shelters, and even employ staff to manage and feed the herds. But it has some benefits, this practice would produce healthier cattle, higher productivity, and prevent the corrosive use of the land.  

Environmental Factor

Open grazing can lead to overgrazing, degradation of natural vegetation, soil erosion, and conflicts with farmers for incursions into their lands.

While ranching will help protect the land, limit the areas of land that are exposed to soil erosion, and reduce environmental degradation.

Conflict Management

Open grazing is a visible trigger of violence. As such, it can lead to conflicts between herders and farmers over rights to land, water and vegetations. If cattle are in ranches, this will minimize the incessant conflicts between herders and farmers and encourage neighbourliness, peace and harmony.

As noted above, each practice has its benefits and challenges. But choosing the lesser evil is always a better option. The lesser evil is ranching, hence the Senate thought that the bill would bring peace between the herders and farmers, prevent killings, encourage farmers to go back to their farms to continue to feed the nation.

Summary

The following is a summary of the key points about ‘What can bring Peace? Open Grazing: An Invisible Violence in Nigeria’:

Open grazing practice is an invisible violence. It can also be a visible trigger of violence in Nigeria.

The new bill: The Senate has taken a bold step to challenge the status quo by proposing a bill known as National Animal Husbandry and Ranches Commission to manage, regulate, and preserve cattle rearing and ranching in Nigeria.

Open grazing and ranching: This writing pointed out some benefits and challenges of both practices but concludes that out of the two evils, ranching will help promote peaceful co-existence between the herders and farmers.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Connection between a Personal Name and Name Groups in Shawnee Social Organisation

Table of Contents Shawnee People The Divisions The Name Groups and Personal Names I’m always attracted to and interested in the culturally distinct and characteristic elements of different traditions or societies. Reading about the Shawnee people of Native American tribes is no different. I immediately fell in love with the linkage between Shawnee name groups and personal names. The name groups seem to present the Shawnee as a one-descent group with five major divisions. To examine this connection between a personal name and name group, a brief description of Shawnee will help in understanding the Shawnee social organisation. Shawnee People The term ‘Shawnee’ written in different forms ( Shaawanwaki, Shaawanowi lenaweeki, and Shawano ) is Algonquian like the archaic term ‘ shaawanwa ’ meaning ‘south.’ Thus, the term ‘Shawnee’ is (pronounced shaw-nee ) meaning the ‘southern people.’ The Shawnees are categorised as Algonquian-speaking North American Indian people whose pristine ho...

Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam

Table of Contents Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam Monk Bahira The Migration to Axum Kingdom Christianity and Islam have always been two noxious bedfellows and yet always proclaim and wish peace on earth. It would not be a crass assumption to state that the two religions have over the centuries crossed paths and re-crossed paths many times. Crossing paths might have been in their ideologies, conflicts, doctrinal interpretations and even sharing some physical spaces. Therefore, in this brief writing, we will explore the early contacts between Christianity and Islam and see how they have influenced each other. Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam The early contacts between Christianity and Islam were not short of frames.  According to Kaufman et al., “frames are cognitive shortcuts that people use to help make sense of complex information.” They are means of interpreting our world and perhaps, the world of other people around us.  Such interpretations helpe...

The Akamba – Concept of the Supreme Being & Totems

Table of Contents Supreme Being (Worships and Venerations) Mulungu   Mumbi  Mwatuangi  Ngai  Asa  Ancestors Totems Here is a brief account of the religious beliefs of the Akamba. Spanning through Central Bantu, the Akamba ethnic group is estimated to be about 4.4 million people and occupies Southeastern Kenya in areas, such as Kangundo, Kibwezi, Kitui, Machakos, Makueni and Mwingi Districts and the Ukamba. A swathe of the Akamba population can also be found in the Mazeras and Kwale Districts of the Coast Province in Shiba Hills. The Akamba languages are Kikamba and Swahili. Globally, the Akamba are not exclusively a Kenyan or African tribe. They can be found in Uganda, Tanzania, and Paraguay, which makes it partly an indigenous group and partly an autochthonal group. Argument from migration theory suggests that Akamba came from Kilimanjaro (a word that means ‘mountain of whiteness’), basing their arguments on the similarity of certain cultural features with the...