Between Predictive and Generative AI: Analogizing with Naïve Physics and Psychology

Overview

Naïve or folk physics and psychology are commonplace in everyday human experience. For the former, it relates to common sense reasoning or theories that help humans understand objects and events in our world. For the latter, it helps in humans' understanding of different mental processes, emotions, and behaviour about oneself and others.

This writing will attempt to consider analogically naïve or folk physics and psychology as pedestals of the technological ingenuities of predictive and generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) by following this outline:

The above can be considered from the predictive prowess of David Beckham who scored his famous goal from the halfway line, for naïve physics, and the FBI profilers' ability to capture the Unabomber, for naïve psychology.  

Those analogies will help us understand predictive AI and generative AI, compare them to everyday experience, and bring to the fore their benefits. Also, by analyzing these machine learning models, attempts will be made to consider the role of humans in the artificial intelligence sphere. At this point, Carl Jung’s collective unconscious is adopted and adapted to understand why Africa as a continent is poor even when it has too many mineral/natural and human resources to feed the entire world.

Halfway-line Goal!

This is Beckham’s signature goal that made him a legend. That is the technique of curving the ball during flight once the goalkeeper has stepped a little away from the goalposts and mentally calculating, measuring both the impetus and velocity of his kick to ensure that the ball gets into the goalposts before the goalkeeper can get back to his position.

His ability to predict the behaviour of the goalkeeper was dependent on many factors, such as severally observing many goalkeepers who stepped out of their penalty yard boxes and intuitively measuring the swiftness of their ability to return to their goalposts. He achieved this because of an understanding of the rules of nature. Beckham’s halfway-line goal seems like a paradox that defies Zeno’s Paradox, and the concept of infinite divisibility.

Zeno’s Paradox

In the Tortoise and Achilles paradox, Zeno of Elea challenges human intuition about time, motion, and infinity. In his paradox, Achilles, the fastest hero created by Homer in the IIiad challenged the tortoise, a slow-moving creature to a race. In this case, the tortoise argues that so long as Achilles allows it a small head start, it will win the race. Achilles trusting in his speed and strength agreed but he was not able to catch up or overtake the tortoise because each time Achilles reached the tortoise's starting point, the tortoise moved a little farther from him.

In this case, it can be said that Achilles’ prediction that he would overtake the tortoise in an infinite divisibility race was flawed because he never overtook the tortoise. However, Beckham’s prediction of target divisibility was accurate, and he scored a goal. His ability to intuitively measure and calculate on the flight, the distance between the position of the goalkeeper when he was away from his goalposts, the impetus and velocity of an inflated piece of rubber (football), and the force of his kick on the piece of rubber to make it travel faster and quicker than the goalkeeper who was away from his goalposts made him a legend of target divisibility.

FBI Profiler and the Unabomber

America’s Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) profilers are notable for their ability to study, learn, and train their minds to understand the behaviours of a criminal to capture them or predict their next action. Often, they are credited with thinking like a criminal or articulating through analyses the next move or subsequent developments of a crime.

The case immediately comes to mind is the Unabomber or Ted Kaczynski as he was known. The Unabomber was a former professor of mathematics who felt desperate and upset by modern inventions, such as technology, and its impact on society. As such, he carried out a 16-year bombing campaign of selected technology companies, universities, and airlines. That drew the attention of the FBI who are charged with protecting Americans at home.

The FBI profilers put on their profiling hats and started to collect data, information, and different writings of the Unabomber. They studied, analyzed, and interpreted his writings and behaviour. Such analyses and studies enabled them to identify patterns of behaviour, clues about movements, and psychological traits. The analysis of the language structure of his manifesto helped connect it to the Unabomber’s earlier writings. Therefore, his writings and pattern of behaviour led to his arrest.

Let’s use the African continent as our next example and in this case, we will try to find reasons or factors why Africa is a poor continent. We will also ask at least three generative AI tools to respond to the question of why Africa is poor.

Africa’s Political and Economic Archetypes

Since the late 50s and early 60s when African nations got independence from their former colonial masters, nothing has changed in terms of their political and economic positions in the world. As the old colonial masters left, Africa inadvertently opened their doors to other masters: lending institutions and lending nations. One begins to wonder. How could a continent that ruthlessly fought for independence could not stand independent? One cannot but assume that what is happening to Africa is not directed by either the old colonial masters or the new masters found in lending institutions and nations. Rather, Africa’s malady is controlled by the inner workings of their psyches. If we ask Carl Jung, he will describe Africa’s problems as being affected by primal drives that are wrapped in their unconscious.

Since its political independence, Africa has constantly been interchanging between two types of evils: Soft and Hard. Soft evil is the endless borrowing of money from international lending institutions and nations that has led to the desperate dispersion of its people to every corner of the world. The money borrowed from those bodies for the development of Africa has ended up in the private pockets of their corrupt leaders and projects not worthy of their names.

Hard evil is the privation of co-existence and tolerance that now and again subject the continent to wars and violent conflicts that decimate the population. It seems every African country identifies with the myths and experiences of either soft or hard evil. Africa seems to share an unexplainable commonality in this soft or hard evil. Jung would describe these unconscious evils ripping Africa apart as their “collective unconscious.” For Jung, “collective unconscious refers to the part of the unconscious mind which is shared by all humans and is inherited from our ancestors.”

If this collective unconscious is an inheritance from our ancestors, politically African leaders are bewitched by the archetypes who have remained their heroes’ past. African leaders stay in office until they are dead. African leaders make themselves life-presidents. African leaders steal from their people. They steal from themselves. African leaders use governance as a means of enriching themselves, their families, and friends. These are common features universally found among African leaders.

Bad governance, grift, and choice between soft and hard evils are hereditary and are passed on from one generation to another. Their political and economic archetypes can be construed as inherited malicious behavioural patterns that are unconsciously applied daily.

When a new African leader takes office, gradually you start to see the application of the unconscious use of archetypes. This ‘collective unconscious’ is in every African psyche, and in every African psyche, there lives the archetypes.

It is pertinent to argue at this point that Africa has continued to generate the same types of leaders who have favoured the types of leadership that surrender to either soft evil or hard evil. Africa is not guided by forces outside but rather by the application of learned patterns following early drives wrapped in the unconscious. To free Africa from these maladies, there is the need for an introduction of a new learning model that redeems the collective unconscious and compels Africa to face its ‘shadows,’ to use Jung’s other imagery.

Let’s delve into predictive and generative AI and examine how beneficial they are to humans and how human naïve physics and psychology work together with the trained models of predictive and generative AI.

Between Predictive and Generative AI

Humans are in the middle between predictive and generative AI because they are the scientists who develop the machines that eventually become the predictors and generators of artificial intelligence. Therefore, a brief consideration of the meaning of predictive and generative AI will help elucidate why humans’ hope and epistemological certitude require a balance between human intelligence and artificial intelligence.

Predictive AI

This is a method of data analysis that uses machine learning (ML) to calculate some future event or outcome. Through analysis of both current pertinent and historical data, predictive AI identifies patterns and trends and thus forecasts outcomes or indicates daily or future likely occurrences.

The predictive AI model is trained through supervised learning to learn the patterns and relationships in a dataset of human-created content. The model is presented with a set of human-created content and corresponding labels from which it learns to generate content very similar to the human-created content that bears the same labels.

This brief description of predictive AI exhibits words like ‘calculate,’ ‘predict,’ ‘forecast,’ ‘patterns,’ and ‘trends.’ Such words are not different in meaning as used in the naïve physics and psychology examples given above: Beckham’s Half-way Goal line and FBI Profiler and the Unabomber. The only difference is that naïve physics and psychology refer to the untrained human perception of common phenomenal activities in the physical world and the untrained human understanding of mental processes, and emotions, of oneself and others.

Predictive AI is a trained model that has been positioned to do things such as:

  • To make recommendations to you based on your content-search preferences, interests, location, buying history, and feedback.
  • To assist companies in optimising their inventory and supply chain management based on demand, distance, acceptability, cost, availability, and demography.
  • To predict a country’s current and future financial status based on income and expenditure, governing patterns, credit history, borrowing habits, debt management, and currency value.
  • To detect irregularities and threats in cybersecurity systems through the analysis of user behaviour, network activity, and threat intelligence.
  • To generate information about the weather based on meteorological observations, patterns of wind movements, hot/cold air, geography, and atmospheric conditions.

These examples of predictive AI help humans in their daily lives to improve their living conditions as well as protect them from either cybercriminals or averting treacherous weather conditions. What about generative AI? Let’s examine its meaning and why it has become a household name in this age.

Generative AI

This is an artificial intelligence that can generate text, images, code, or any type of content according to the prompt of the user. Just like predictive AI, a generative AI model is trained through supervised learning to learn the patterns and relationships in a dataset of human-created content. It does this by learning from existing data and can generate new data very similar in style to the training data.

The difference between predictive and generative AI is while the former outputs predictions and forecasts, the latter outputs new content. Generative AI has quite some benefits:

  • It can explore large unstructured data.
  • It can help to improve customer interactions.
  • It does well in repetitive tasks and can help organizations devote to other non-repetitive tasks.
  • It has made research easier and convenient by bringing research materials to hand.

Generative AI is meant for humans and not humans for generative AI. How do we position this essential and helpful tool so that it equitably serves our interests? In the next section and adopting Jung’s basic principle of ‘collective unconscious’ an attempt will be made to describe generative AI from the perspective of ‘generative unconscious.’

Generative Unconscious

The idea of generative unconscious stems from Jung’s psychotherapeutic analysis based on his research on the collective unconscious, where the commonly found symbols and myths form part of the universally shared collective unconscious. Above, the same collective unconscious was used to describe Africa’s political and economic archetypes, where different layers of inherited memories form the totality of their experience.

The generative unconscious is placing the generative AI tools to the test. How would these tools generate responses to a single question? Africa is the case in point because it has been used as an example of a continent whose collective unconscious controls and motivates the inner workings of their minds.

Three generative AI tools are chosen for this exercise: Copilot, Google Bard, and ChatGPT. One simple and same question was asked each of the tools: Why is Africa poor? The responses from each one of them were nothing far from what might be described as a ‘generative unconscious.’

These generative AI tools listed some reasons why Africa is poor. However, it advised that the details of the information may not be correct and that it is the user’s responsibility to check for the veracity of the responses. Here, it is not the veracity of the responses of the AI tools that are being considered but their capacity to generate responses that suggest a type of collective unconscious, as if the generative AI tools generate content from the memories of different data.

Copilot

Copilot gives these reasons or factors that contributed to Africa’s poverty:

Historical and Colonial Legacy

It then listed the following as some of the factors that contributed to poverty in Africa.

  • History of slavery
  • Colonization
  • Exploitation by foreign powers
  • Weak institutions
  • Poor governance
  • Unequal distribution of resources

Economic Challenges and Unemployment 

It listed some contributing factors in that regard:

  • Low productivity
  • High inflation
  • Debt
  • Corruption
  • Trade barriers
  • Unemployment

Health Issues and Access to Medical Care

It listed some contributing factors as:

  • Lack of adequate healthcare systems and infrastructure
  • Covid19 pandemic
  • Vulnerability to preventable diseases
  • Malnutrition
  • Maternal and child mortality

Climate Change and Environmental Degradation

  • Droughts
  • Floods
  • Desertification
  • Crop failures
  • Food security
  • Water availability
  • Deforestation
  • Soil erosion
  • Pollution

Bard

Broadly, Bard categorized Africa’s poverty into historical, economic, political, and social influences.

Historical Factors

  • The Legacy of Colonialism
  • Forceful extraction of resources and wealth from Africa by colonial powers
  • Imposition of their political and economic systems on Africa
  • The Cold War
  • The division of Africa and drawn into the proxy conflicts between the United States and the Soviet Union

Economic Factors

  • Trap in a cycle of poverty
  • Dependence on primary exports
  • Lack of infrastructure – good roads, electricity, and sanitation

Political Factors

  • Corruption
  • Weak institutions – the police, judiciary, and the civil service
  • Political instability
  • Coups, civil wars, and ethnic conflicts.

Social Factors

  • High population growth
  • Disease – HIV/AIDS, and malaria
  • Gender inequality
  • Limitation of women's participation in the economy, access to education and healthcare.

ChatGPT

This tool stated that several key reasons contribute to Africa’s economic challenges:

Historical Factors

  • Colonialism
  • Governance systems
  • Social structures
  • European powers' exploitation of Africa’s resources
  • Their disruption of local economies
  • Establishment of extractive systems that persisted even after Africa’s independence.

Economic Challenges

  • High levels of debt
  • Limited access to capital
  • Inadequate infrastructure
  • Reliance on primary commodities for export
  • Fluctuating commodity prices
  • Limited value addition

Governance and Corruption

  • Weak institutions
  • Siphoning of resources

Conflict and Instability

  • Conflicts and civil wars
  • Displacement of people
  • Destruction of infrastructure
  • Social unrest

Health Challenges

  • Diseases – HIV/AIDS, malaria, other health issues

Environmental issues

  • Droughts
  • Desertification
  • Climate change
  • Food security
  • Access to water

Limited Access to Education and Skills

  • Inadequate access to quality education
  • Limited access to skills training

Global Trade Dynamics

  • Unfair trade practices
  • Market barriers
  • Unequal terms of trade with developed countries

The three generative AI tools used to get responses to the question: Why is Africa poor gave three almost similar responses notwithstanding the uniqueness of each generative AI tool. This suggests that they derive their responses from the same pool of knowledge or episteme, though trained using different models.

Summary

The key points raised in this writing are that naïve or folk physics and psychology influence our everyday human experience.

Through mental calculation and measuring both the impetus and velocity of his kick to ensure that the ball gets into the goalposts before the goalkeeper can get back to his position, David Beckham established a halfway-line goal signature.

Also, through accurate profiling, the FBI identified patterns of behaviour, clues about movements, and psychological traits of the Unabomber.

Using Carl Jung’s analyses of collective unconscious, there is a suggestion that Africa is bewitched by the archetypes who have remained their heroes’ past.

Finally, a question about: Why Africa is a poor continent was asked three generative AIs: Copilot, Bard, and ChatGPT. The responses by each were so similar that nothing far from what might be described as ‘generative unconscious.’

Sources

Jung, C.G. (1968). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (R.F.C. Hull, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Routledge.

“Generative AI vs. Predictive AI” in SS&C Blueprism, 10 October 2023, Colin Redbond. https://www.blueprism.com/resources/blog/generative-ai-vs-predictive-ai/ accessed 30/11/2023.

“Unlocking The Power of Predictive Analytics With AI”, in Forbes, 11 August 2021, Kevin Beasley. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2021/08/11/unlocking-the-power-of-predictive-analytics-with-ai/?sh=380e7b0d6b2a accessed 25/11/2023.

“Predictive AI in Cybersecurity: What Works and How to Understand It”, in Blackberry Blog, 18 October 2023, Shiladitya Sircar. https://blogs.blackberry.com/en/2023/10/predictive-ai-in-cybersecurity accessed 25/11/2023. 

Popular posts from this blog

Early Contacts between Christianity and Islam

The Connection between a Personal Name and Name Groups in Shawnee Social Organisation

The Akamba – Concept of the Supreme Being & Totems

Begrudging & Infightings: Aztec’s Theogony & Cosmogony

Nigeria’s Pledge Vs the President’s Mandate: An Antithesis of Patriotism

The Aesir Vs the Vanir – The gods at War

Nigeria’s 2023 Presidential Election - from preparation to verdicts

The Weyekin in Nez Percé Tribe and Catholic Angels

The Conflict between the Deities (Igwe and Amadioha) in Igbo Mythology over a Heat Wave