Skip to main content

The Conflict between the Deities (Igwe and Amadioha) in Igbo Mythology over a Heat Wave


Table of Contents

Introduction

The current heat wave reminds me of the conflict between two Igbo deities, namely: Igwe and Amadioha. Just as it was noted somewhere in this blog: Nigeria's Diversity and the South-East/South-South Peripheral Inclusions: Biafra's Raison d'etre, November 15, 2021, the Igbo people are the third-largest ethnic group who live in southeastern Nigeria. They have a very rich culture and tradition among which is their concept of God which varies from one community to another but essentially, they believe that the gods guide and control their life and affairs in many ways.

The Igbo concept of God stems from the idea of a chief god who creates everything. This god is supreme. The Igbo variously call this god Olisa bu uwa (the god who carries the world), Olisa bini Igwe, (the god who lives in the sky), Chukwu (the great god), or Chineke (the god who creates). For the Igbo, God, depending on the name he/she is called is spiritual and a creative force responsible for all that exists.

The Igbo view God, Olisa bu uwa, Olisa bini Igwe, Chineke, or Chukwu as the different names suggest as transcendent and immanent, hence the Igbo can feel God’s presence in their lives and affairs. God is far and near. The Igbo often describe God as Ono nso erughi aka (the God who is near but cannot be reached). As a result, there are other intermediaries through which the Igbo communicate with the supreme God. The Igbo concept of God also includes the concept of deities, spirits called Arusi and chi (or personal gods).

Like in many religions, the supreme being is often revered and their names are seldom used when addressing them. Not only the Igbo supreme being is transcendent and immanent, but holiness is also one of the major attributes. Thus, the deities or spirits play mediatory roles. In this vein, the deities, such as Igwe and Amadioha are categorized as Arusi.

The Deity – Igwe

 In Igbo’s understanding of the world, they divided it into two: Elu na Ala (literally, up and down) but it means ‘sky and land.’ In the Igbo language, ‘sky’ is known as ‘igwe’. There is a deity that controls or oversees the sky. This deity is called Igwe. She is the goddess of the sky and oversees the thickness of the clouds, the rain, thunder, lightning, the sun, the moon, the stars, and so on.

The Deity – Amadioha

The Igbo also believe that no deity has the atmospheric elements monopoly. Amadioha is the god of thunder and lightning. Bear in mind that Amadioha is an Arusi, an image made by humans but conferred on him the powers of adjudication for justice and retribution. The name Amadi -oha means (literally, man public), but it means ‘free man or free-born.’  

The Conflict between Igwe and Amadioha

Why was there a conflict between Igwe and Amadioha? Between a female deity and a male deity? Mythology has it this way: the conflict resulted from jurisdiction and control over the atmospheric elements and how they are applied to humans. The backdrop of the region’s weather will help in the description of the conflict between Igwe and Amadioha.

Igboland falls within the boundaries of Monsoons that last from June through September. This period sees heavy rains that can lead to flooding, landslides, and in most cases gullies. Sometimes, the Monsoons can cause extended dry seasons, hot weather resulting in hot air, scorched earth, that is vegetation dried out by the heat of the sun.

Occasionally, the region experiences clap of thunderstorms and flashes of lightning during rainfall. In addition to that, the sounds of the thunderstorms are like the heavy sounds of cannons that can be deafening and flashes of light that can light up an entire village.

It was said that Amadioha was frustrated and annoyed by the incessant heatwave on the land, and on the earth which was a result of the heat of the sun. Remember that the sun is above in the sky and the goddess of the sky is Igwe. So, Amadioha was blaming Igwe for using her powers and resources to harm humans and the fruits of their labours. Igwe said nothing nor stopped the sun from shining. Amadioha then ordered Igwe to stop harming humans with her sun, but she did not.

Both deities have some strong atmospheric elements in their disposals: thunder, lightning, and storms. Each tried to outwit the other by the several releases of thunderbolts, and lightning and hauling them at each other. As Amadioha sent the thunderbolts and lightning to Igwe’s heat, the heat mixing with the effects of the thunderbolts resulted in the formation of thick and dark clouds.

According to the mythology, some elders said that Amadioha came out a winner because he was able to release rain that cool the earth. Some argued that Igwe came out victorious because Igwe is always above or superior to Earth, hence the Igbo say that "Igwe k'ala" that is, 'the sky is bigger than the Earth.' Some elders also said that neither Amadioha nor Igwe won but rather both reached an agreement to maintain a balance where there will not be too much sun to burn out the earth nor too much water to drown it.

The conflict between Igwe and Amadioha in Igbo mythology can be said to elicit the equality of genders. The male deity, Amadioha challenged the female deity, Igwe to a battle of might to determine who controls the atmospheric forces and can bring solace and comfort to humans. The mythology also shows that in Igbo tradition, their gods or deities can work together or collaborate to ensure the well-being of humans.  

So, as the heat wave continues, there are debates about what is causing the excessive heat in the world today. The Igbo ancestors might have experienced this type of heatwave that led to this myth or something of similar nature. From a modern interpretation of this mythology, it seems that climate is somehow involved, whether it was a changing climate or not, the emphasis of the mythology was that there was at some point severe hot weather that was scorching the earth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Alternative Self (Part IV): Beyond the Mechanics of Substitution

In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of The Self-Alternating Theory , we mapped the intricate mechanics of human positioning: how individuals continuously swap roles, situations, and existential stations within the architecture of society. We observed the relentless cycle of substitution: how power yields to vulnerability, how victims inherit the machinery of oppression, and how raw human drives alternate between expression and suppression. Yet, mapping the engine of alternation leaves a critical question unanswered: Are we permanently condemned to react to the swap, or can we consciously choose our orientation within it? This is where The Alternative Self emerges, not as a passive participant in life’s endless rotation, but as a deliberate act of internal sovereignty and transformation. Let’s break it down. Breaking the Compulsive Cycle Under the framework of The Self-Alternating Theory , human behaviour often appears deterministic. Bad leadership, tyranny, and destructive compulsions tend t...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part III): Policy Making, Criminal Justice, and Artificial Intelligence

In its foundational frameworks, the Self-Alternating Theory dismantled the comforting lie of portable identity. We established that an individual cannot simply carry their personal moral compass, intellect, or lived experience into another vessel: whether that vessel belongs to a failed head of state, a world-class athlete, an oppressed minority, or a body enduring chronic illness. Context, neurobiology, and systemic history do not merely surround the individual; they generate the "I." When extended beyond the personal sphere, this theory delivers a profound critique of our most crucial societal structures. Policy making, criminal justice, and artificial intelligence are built on a dangerous assumption: that human behaviour, guilt, and machine intelligence exist in a vacuum, detached from the systemic currents that shape them. By examining these three pillars through the lens of the Self-Alternating Theory, we expose the flaws of armchair governance, punitive justice, and...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions.   The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...