Self-determination: Principle of Action or Impracticable Charter

Table of Contents

Why the Initiative of Self-determination?

The Latin phrase ‘ius cogens’ (meaning ‘compelling law’) is a fundamental principle of international law that is accepted as a norm by all member states of the United Nations (UN) and cannot be suppressed by any power.

The principle of self-determination is a charter of the UN that states that a people, community, or nation has the right to choose its political identity, form of government, the exercise of sovereignty, and independent external relations with no interference.

The UN is charged with the burden of interpreting the charter’s principle. As such the principle of self-determination is one of those compelling laws.

Why the Initiative of Self-determination?

It was a response to curb the authoritarianism of the era and enthrone equality, liberty, and freedom. The idea began with the American and French revolutions in the 18th century. Shortly after WWI, Woodrow Wilson conceived the idea of self-determination as a roadmap for redrawing European and world maps and putting in place a new understanding and a just world. Then after WWII, it became a charter of the UN and a legal right under international law. Ever since its adoption by the UN, it saw the decolonization of countries formerly held under dominion by European nations and latterly, the independence of the colonies.

Today, the principle is applied and interpreted by groups fighting or struggling within a state for autonomy or independence for reasons of consequences. In this age, there are hundreds of nations, groups, and people seeking autonomy or independence. One can ask: What is the role of the UN in those matters? Is self-determination a principle of action or just an impractical charter?

UN should do more. It should be proactive in dealing with nations or people crying for freedom or seeking autonomy. They should be listened to and understood. I think it will make for a better and more peaceful world. It may even help curtail the rate of migrations all over the world and reduce the power and control of despots.

Comments

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence. The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Alternative Self (Part IV): Beyond the Mechanics of Substitution

In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of The Self-Alternating Theory , we mapped the intricate mechanics of human positioning: how individuals continuously swap roles, situations, and existential stations within the architecture of society. We observed the relentless cycle of substitution: how power yields to vulnerability, how victims inherit the machinery of oppression, and how raw human drives alternate between expression and suppression. Yet, mapping the engine of alternation leaves a critical question unanswered: Are we permanently condemned to react to the swap, or can we consciously choose our orientation within it? This is where The Alternative Self emerges, not as a passive participant in life’s endless rotation, but as a deliberate act of internal sovereignty and transformation. Let’s break it down. Breaking the Compulsive Cycle Under the framework of The Self-Alternating Theory , human behaviour often appears deterministic. Bad leadership, tyranny, and destructive compulsions tend t...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part III): Policy Making, Criminal Justice, and Artificial Intelligence

In its foundational frameworks, the Self-Alternating Theory dismantled the comforting lie of portable identity. We established that an individual cannot simply carry their personal moral compass, intellect, or lived experience into another vessel: whether that vessel belongs to a failed head of state, a world-class athlete, an oppressed minority, or a body enduring chronic illness. Context, neurobiology, and systemic history do not merely surround the individual; they generate the "I." When extended beyond the personal sphere, this theory delivers a profound critique of our most crucial societal structures. Policy making, criminal justice, and artificial intelligence are built on a dangerous assumption: that human behaviour, guilt, and machine intelligence exist in a vacuum, detached from the systemic currents that shape them. By examining these three pillars through the lens of the Self-Alternating Theory, we expose the flaws of armchair governance, punitive justice, and...

Names, Visions, and Imageries of the Crow tribe of Native Americans

Table of Contents The Crow: Who are they? Names, Visions, and Imageries Apsaalooke (or Absaroka) The Separations of the Bands The Mountain Crow (Ashalaho) The River Crow The Kicked in the Bellies Chiefs, Their Names and Meanings Chief Long Hair (Issheuhutskitu) Chief Sore Belly (Arapoosh) Chief of the Camp (Ashbacheeitche) Chief of Plenty Coups The rich cultural heritage of the Native Americans is subject to different interpretations beyond the actual meanings as understood by the natives. The Crow tribe’s names, visions, and imageries are not spared from these relative interpretations. It is claimed that these names, visions, and imageries denote exaggerations, triumphalism, or cultural symbolism. Also, their name can visually reveal the true meanings of descriptive language and metaphors or similes in words and expressions. The objective of this writing is to examine these names and imageries to differentiate the Europeans’ interpretations of the names and lifestyle of the Cr...

The Self-Alternating Theory: Why We Can Never Truly Be the Other

We live in a culture obsessed with the exercise of perspective-taking. We tell ourselves to "walk a mile in another person’s shoes," if our core self: our moral compass, our intellectual agility, our refined tastes, and our personal ethics remains intact during the journey. We imagine slipping into the lives of others like costume changes in a play: maintaining our internal "I" while operating the external machinery of someone else's life. The Self-Alternating Theory challenges this fundamental illusion. It posits a sobering premise: you cannot be the other, whether in their best or worst selves. If you were truly transplanted into another person’s existence: inheriting their exact neurobiology, trauma, muscle memory, history, and social incentives you would not reform their life from an enlightened, outside perspective. You would either collapse under the weight of an alien context or become the very thing you previously judged, admired, or misunderstood. ...

iPostThisWeek

Search This Blog