Skip to main content

Tawhid & the Arguments


Table of Contents

Tawhid in the Islamic religion is the belief that there is only one unique God. The concept of Tawhid appeals to Islamic monotheism, which is essentially and absolutely summarized in the Shahadah (the profession of faith). Briefly, an attempt will be made to describe the Shahadah as the cornerstone of Islamic monotheism. 

The Shahadah

The Shahadah is made up of two professions: “There is no god but God” and “Muhammad is the Messenger of God” (La ilaha illa’Llah, Muhammad-ur-Rasul-Allah). The first section of the Shahadah centres on the oneness and indivisibility of God, and the second section is on the prophethood of Muhammad. Nasr opined about the importance of the Shahadah:

The most fundamental formula of the Qur’an is the Shahadah, that is, witness or testimony, La ilaha illa’Llah, that there is only one God. “The first pillar of Islam is the “The Shahadah” … It comes from the Arabic word “الشَهَادة” which means “The Testimony”, the testimony that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah (SWT) and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah (SWT).”[i] 

First Part

According to some Muslims, the first part of the Shahadah has no special attachment to the Islamic religion. They tend to suggest that it is a clarion call to all humanity to acknowledge the Oneness of God. According to Murata and Chittick:

For Muslims, the first Shahadah has no special connection with the religion brought by Muhammad. Rather, it expresses Islam in the widest sense – it explains why everything in the heavens and the earth is submitted to God. It also expresses Islam in the narrower sense of the religion of all the prophets. The most explicit Koranic verse here is, “And We never sent a messenger before thee save that We revealed to him, saying, ‘There is no god but I, so worship Me’” (21:25). All prophets have come with the message of tawhid.[ii] 

Norcliffe asserts that the concept of Tawhid (oneness, unity) of God “is applied in general to the Muslim community in the belief in one worldwide Islamic umma or community... God is one, an indivisible unity.”[iii] 

In the Qur’an, many verses reiterate the concept of Tawhid. Surah (Al-Ikhlas 112) profusely reflects on this oneness of God and some Islamic scholars hinge on their analyses of it. According to Qutb, Surah (Al-Ikhlas 112) is declared as “equivalent to one-third of the Qur’an.”[iv] Writing further on this, Qutb noted that there is nothing out of place in saying that “He is Allah, the one and only God...”[v] hence:

For the unity of Allah which the Messenger was ordered to declare to the whole world is a belief to be ingrained in our beings, an explanation of human existence, and a way of life. From this standpoint, the surah can be said to have embraced the principal and utmost fundamental ideas of the great truth of Islam in the clearest terms.[vi]

Further, he argued that Surah (Al-Ikhlas 112) was the reason for the call of Islam:

For the sake of all this, the first call to Islam was devoted to the establishment of the reality of the unity of Allah in the hearts and minds of men... It is life in its entirety and religion in its totality and whatever results follow it are no more than the natural fruits of its establishment in the hearts and minds of mankind.[vii]

Second Part

The second part is the prophetic role of Muhammad to teach pagan Arabia about the oneness of Allah. Tawhid strongly opposes the polytheism that was rampant in Makkah in seventh-century Arabia. 

In this writing, an effort will be made to examine different Surahs that emphasized the import of monotheism. Besides, some comparisons would be made in terms of the way different authors’ translations and understanding of the term, Tawhid. Some of these translators of the Qur’an considered here include Al-Hilali and Khan 1996;[viii] Yusuf ‘Ali 2008[ix] and Rodwell 1994.[x]

We will begin by examining the Surahs about the warnings from the Prophets about the worship of God.

Al-A’raf 7:59

Al-Hilali and Khan

Yusuf ‘Ali

Rodwell

“Indeed, We sent Nuh (Noah) to his people and he said: “O my people! Worship Allah! You have no other llah (God) but Him...”

“We sent Noah to his people. He said: ‘O my people, worship Allah! Ye have no other god but Him....”

“Of old, We sent Noah to his people, and he said, ‘O my people! Worship God. Ye have no God but Him:”

The three above-mentioned translations could be communicating the same message however, they raise another problem especially when examining their syntagmatic relations. For example, Al-Hilali and Khan 1996 translated the said verse as: “You have no other llah (God) but Him”; Yusuf ‘Ali has it as: “Ye have no other god but Him”; and for Rodwell: “Ye have no God but Him.” This is a bit confusing especially when the Shahadah says: ‘There is no god but God.’ Switching god with God, that is, interchanging the upper and lower cases of the letter (g) changes the meaning of the first section of the Shahadah.

The issue of how humankind began the worship of different gods and why God sent Noah (Nuh) as a Messenger is quite revealing. Ibn Kathir’s commentary on Surah (Al-A‘raf 7: 59) claims that:

‘Abdullah bin ‘Abbas and several other scholars of Tafsir said that the first idol worship began when some righteous people died and their people built places of worship over their graves. They made images of them so they could remember their righteousness and devotion and thus imitate them. When time passed, they made statues of them and later on worshipped these idols, naming them after the righteous people: Wadd, Suwa‘, Yaghuth, Ya‘uq, and Nasr. After this practice became popular, Allah sent Nuh as a Messenger, all thanks are due to Him. Nuh commanded his people to worship Allah alone without partners...[xi]

An-Nahl 16:36

Al-Hilali and Khan

Yusuf ‘Ali

Rodwell

“And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): “Worship Allah (Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taghut (all false deities, i.e. do not worship Taghut besides Allah).”

“For We assuredly sent amongst every People a Messenger, (with the Command), ‘Serve Allah, and eschew Evil.’”

“And to every people have we sent an apostle saying: - Worship God and turn away from Taghut.”

Examining the syntagmatic relations of the translations, it appears different meanings have been given to the above-mentioned verse.

Commenting on this same (An-Nahl 16:36), Ibn Kathir argues that: “The legislative will of Allah is clear and cannot be taken as an excuse by them, because He had forbidden them to do that upon the tongue of His Messengers, but by His universal will...He allowed them to do that as it was decreed for them.”[xii]

Adh-Dhariyat 51:56

Al-Hilali and Khan

Yusuf ‘Ali

Rodwell 

“And I (Allah) created not jinn and mankind except that they should worship Me (Alone).”

“I have only created jinns and men, that they may serve me.”

“I have not created Djinn and men, but that they should worship me.”

 

The above citations and translations directly emphasize the reason why God created mankind. According to Ibn Kathir, the meaning of Surah (Adh-Dhariyat 51: 56) is:

Allah the Exalted, the Blessed created the creatures so that they may worship Him alone without partners. Those who obey Him will be rewarded with the best rewards, while those who disobey Him will receive the worst punishment from Him. Allah stated that He does not need creatures, but rather, they need Him in all conditions. He is alone their Creator and Provider.[xiii]

Al-Anbiya 21:25

Al-Hilali and Khan

Yusuf ‘Ali

Rodwell

“And We did not send any Messenger before you (O Muhammad...) but We revealed to him (saying): La ilaha illa Ana [none has the right to be worshipped but I (Allah), so worship Me (Alone and no one else).”

“Not a messenger did We send before thee without this inspiration sent by Us to him: that there is no god but I; therefore, worship and serve me.”

“No apostle have we sent before thee to whom we did not reveal that ‘Verily there is no God beside me: therefore, worship me.”

The above spell out the Islamic unparalleled profession of the oneness and uniqueness of God. For Ibn Kathir “Every Prophet who was sent by Allah called people to worship Allah Alone, with no partner or associate. The natural inclination of man (Al-Fitrah) also bears witness to that. The idolators have no proof and their dispute is of no use before their Lord; on them is wrath, and for them will be a severe torment.”[xiv]

Ibn Kathir explained further the importance of divine worship to God alone by pointing readers to the narration of Ibn ‘Abbas:

(You alone do we worship) means it is You alone, O our Lord, whom we worship, fear and supplicate, none other than you. (To you alone do we pray for help) means we seek your assistance in obeying You and in the management of our daily lives. These two statements were mentioned in this order because worship (ibadah) is the objective we all seek and seeking assistance is our means of achieving it.[xv]

Conclusion

It is pertinent to state that there is an unrivalled presentation of the idea of God as one and indivisible in the Qur'an. Though we pointed out the problem about the syntagmatic relations as a result of translations, the meanings may change, the underpinning statement is that the Tawhid is the distinctive force of Islamic monotheism. To understand Islam is to understand the Shahadah and to understand the Shahadah is to acknowledge its monotheism. 


[i] The Shahadah: The First Pillar of Islam. In Quran Ayat Institute. https://quranayat.com/the-shahadah-the-first-pillar-of-islam/ (accessed 30 April 2021).

[ii] Murata, S, & Chittick, WC 1996, The Vision of Islam: The Foundations of Muslim Faith and Practice, IB Tauris, London. Pp 45-46.

[iii] Norcliffe, D 1999, Islam, Faith and Practice, Sussex Academic Press, Brighton.

[iv] Qutb, S 1981, In the shade of the Qur’an, vol. 30, translated by M. Adil Salahi & Ashur A. Shamis, MWH London Publishers, England. P. 350

[v] Ibid.

[vi] Ibid.

[vii] Ibid. pp 352-353

[viii] The Noble Quran: Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur'an in the English Language. Muhammand Taqi-ud-Din Al-Hilali & Muhammad Muhsin Khan. Dar-us-Salam Publications. 1996

[ix]  The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an. Abdullah Yusuf Ali. English Edition. 2008

[x] The Koran, translated by J.M. Rodwell. Everyman Library London. 1994

[xi] Ibn Kathir, 2000a, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, abridged vol. 4, (Surat Al-A‘raf to the end of Surah Yunus), abridged by a group of scholars under the supervision of Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri, Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh. P. 87

[xii] Ibn Kathir, 2000b, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, abridged vol. 5, (Surah Hud to Surat Al-Isra’, verse 38), abridged & supervised by Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri, Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh. P. 462

[xiii] Ibn Kathir, 2000c, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, abridged vol.9, (Surat Al-Jathiyah to the end of Surat Al-Munafiqun), abridged & supervised by Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri, Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh. P. 277

[xiv] Ibn Kathir, 2000d, Tafsir Ibn Kathir, abridged vol. 6, (Surat Al-Isra’, Verse 39 to the end of Surat Al-Mu’minun), abridged & supervised by Shaykh Safiur-Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri, Darussalam Publishers & Distributors, Riyadh. P. 437

[xv] Ibn Kathir 1998, Surah Al-Fatihah Surah-Al-Baqarah, ayat 1 to 141, Part 1, abridged by Sheikh Muhammad Nasib Ar-Rafa ‘i, Al-Firdous Ltd, London. P. 43

  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Alternative Self (Part IV): Beyond the Mechanics of Substitution

In Parts 1, 2, and 3 of The Self-Alternating Theory , we mapped the intricate mechanics of human positioning: how individuals continuously swap roles, situations, and existential stations within the architecture of society. We observed the relentless cycle of substitution: how power yields to vulnerability, how victims inherit the machinery of oppression, and how raw human drives alternate between expression and suppression. Yet, mapping the engine of alternation leaves a critical question unanswered: Are we permanently condemned to react to the swap, or can we consciously choose our orientation within it? This is where The Alternative Self emerges, not as a passive participant in life’s endless rotation, but as a deliberate act of internal sovereignty and transformation. Let’s break it down. Breaking the Compulsive Cycle Under the framework of The Self-Alternating Theory , human behaviour often appears deterministic. Bad leadership, tyranny, and destructive compulsions tend t...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part II): The Fractured Mirror of Context

In the first iteration of the Self-Alternating Theory, we dismantled the illusion of portable identity. We demonstrated that if you were transplanted into the life of a failed leader, a sex worker, a saint, or an elite athlete, you would not reform or master their world from an enlightened external perspective. You would either crumble under the weight of an alien context or absorb their exact trajectory. Part II extends this radical lens across the fundamental fault lines of human experience: relationships, race, geopolitics, physical embodiment, and the outer boundaries of species existence.                        The underlying principle remains absolute: we do not take our intact "I" into another person's reality. The reality reshapes, overwrites, or breaks the "I." Relational Systems: The Model Partner vs. The Toxic Household We routinely look at fractured marriages...

The Self-Alternating Theory (Part III): Policy Making, Criminal Justice, and Artificial Intelligence

In its foundational frameworks, the Self-Alternating Theory dismantled the comforting lie of portable identity. We established that an individual cannot simply carry their personal moral compass, intellect, or lived experience into another vessel: whether that vessel belongs to a failed head of state, a world-class athlete, an oppressed minority, or a body enduring chronic illness. Context, neurobiology, and systemic history do not merely surround the individual; they generate the "I." When extended beyond the personal sphere, this theory delivers a profound critique of our most crucial societal structures. Policy making, criminal justice, and artificial intelligence are built on a dangerous assumption: that human behaviour, guilt, and machine intelligence exist in a vacuum, detached from the systemic currents that shape them. By examining these three pillars through the lens of the Self-Alternating Theory, we expose the flaws of armchair governance, punitive justice, and...

Echo-Collate: The Inevitable Vanguard of Electoral Integrity in Nigeria

In a modern democracy, the ballot box is the bedrock of legitimacy. Yet, for millions of Nigerians, the primary challenge of governance has long been ensuring that the votes cast at polling units faithfully reflect the results declared at collation centres. The introduction of the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) Result Viewing Portal (IReV) marked a watershed moment in Nigeria's electoral evolution, promising real-time transparency by making polling unit result sheets (Form EC8A) publicly accessible. However, as experience has demonstrated, a single institutional system, no matter how well-designed remains susceptible to technical bottlenecks, network downtime, server overloads, human delay, and trust deficits. Enter Echo-Collate ( collate.echobeacon.net ), built upon the robust infrastructure of EchoBeacon.net. Designed as an independent, real-time shadow and backup tooling framework for INEC’s IReV, Echo-Collate represents a technological response to Niger...

The Weyekin in Nez Percé Tribe and Catholic Angels

Table of Contents The Nez Percé People Catholic Teachings on Angels The Spirit, Weyekin in Nez Percé Tribe This writing is to briefly identify and recognize some cultural values of the Nez Percé tribe, especially their belief in Weyekin, often described as a personal guiding angel. The concept of a guiding angel provokes Catholic teachings about angels and comparison with the Nez Percé Weyekin, as the guiding spirit. But that will be a new piece of writing for the future. There can be a cross-cultural gleaning of ideas from nature, beliefs, and interactions.     The Nez Percé People The term Nez Percé, meaning “pierced nose” is the French coinage to describe the Nimiipuu tribe. The term Nimiipuu, meaning “we, the people” is a name the tribe used for themselves and their language, a part of the Sahaptin family. Early contacts with the Europeans, especially French explorers made the name Nez Percé popular because they unfairly adopted the name Nez Percé and u...